PurposeTo compare the efficacy and complications of Artisan iris claw intraocular lens implantation and posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation for the treatment of aphakic eyes without capsular support after vitrectomy.
MethodsA prospective study of 31 cases was conducted. 31 eyes without sufficient lens capsule support following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined lens extraction were divided into two groups. Group one:18 eyes received Artisan iris claw intraocular lens implantation. Group two:13 eyes received posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation. The corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA) and intraocular pressure,corneal endothelial cell loss rate, surgical time and complications were compared between two groups.Pigment changes of trabecular meshwork and anterior chamber depths were measured at each time point in Artisan group.
Results The mean surgical time of Artisan group was significantly shorter (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in endothelial cell loss rate was noted between two groups at any time point (P>0.05). CDVA of Artian group was better than that of the sulcus fixation group 1 day after surgery(P<0.05) and there was no statistically significant difference 1 month and 3 months after surgery(P>0.05). Mean IOP showed no significant differences between groups before and after surgery. The postoperative complications of Artisan group were anterior uveitis, iris depigmentation,pupillary distortion and spontaneous lens dislocation. The complications of sulcus fixation group include choroidal detachment, intraocular haemorrhage, tilt of IOL optic part and retinal detachment.
Conclusion Secondary Artisan IOL implantation can be performed less invasively and in a shorter surgical time period with earlier visual recovery after surgery compared to transscleral suturing fixation of an IOL. This technique is an effective and safe procedure. It is a promising option for the treatment of aphakic eyes without capsular support after vitrectomy. |
